Free CIMA CIMAPRA19-P03-1-ENG Exam Questions

Become CIMA Certified with updated CIMAPRA19-P03-1-ENG exam questions and correct answers

Page: 1 / 56

Total 276 Questions | Updated On: Aug 01, 2026

Add To Cart

Question 1

Which TWO of the following scenarios should be considered in strategic scenario planning by a publishing company that specialises in academic textbooks?

A : ere could be a change in the technology used by consumers, such as smaller mobile phones with smaller screens

B : dget changes could have an impact on the funding available to college and university libraries

C : terms offered by media companies for film rights for books could change

D : The quality of output from printing presses might improve

E : vironmental concerns could lead to a decrease in the availability of trees to make paper

Answer: B,C

Question 2

Company M has lost 25% of its revenue in the last three months due to bad debts. One of thereceivables written offwasfroma long standing customer and the other three werefromnew customers. The management accountant has warned the sales team that the company cannot survive any more substantial bad debts.
Which of the following internal controls should be put in place to try and prevent further bad debts?

A : credit check should be carried out on each new customer.

B : edit limits should be set for all customers. However, if the credit limit will cost a sale then sales staff can override this limit.

C : o sales staff must authorise new customers and sign a form stating that they have done so.

D : aged analysis of customer balances must be reviewed every month.

E : soon as a customer payment is overdue they should not be allowed to purchase more until their balance has been reduced

Answer: A,D

Question 3

A has an opportunity to invest $90,000 in a project that is expected to generate annual cash inflows of $60,000 for each of the next three years. The project's beta coefficient implies a discount rate of 12% for this project, based on a risk-free rate of return of 3%.
A is prepared to forego the expected cash flows from this project in return for a guaranteed payment of $50,000 at the end of year 1, $42,000 at the end of year 2 and $30,000 at the end of year 3.
What is the certainty equivalent value of this opportunity to A?

A : $9,493

B : $25,606

C : $54,120

D : $115,606

Answer: B

Question 4

Having carried out a full capital appraisal for a construction project, HCompanyhasapproved the project with initial outflows of $6,000,000 anda net present value of $1,200,000.
The implementation phase has been commenced with 25% of the costs already committed.However whenthe ground was opened, an underground waterway was revealedwhich will need to be diverted if the project is to proceed. Work to carry out this diversion has been estimated at $1,300,000.
Which of the following factors will define whether the project should go ahead or not?

A : project actually has a higher NPV than before.

B : project now has a negative NPV.

C : andoning the project will have an adverse effect on shareholder confidence.

D : ere will be abandonment costs to restore the site.

E : ere may be other unexpected costs to be met if the project continues.

Answer: A,D

Question 5

GHY is a listed company. Tom isGHY'sCEO and Peter isitsnon-executive Chair of the Board. Tom and Peterbothhave substantial relevant business and industrial experience andboth are believed to have considerable integrity. Tom and Peter quickly developed a good working relationship after Peter's appointment. They have become close friends.
Tom briefs Peter on every aspect of the business. Tom and Peter jointlyagreethe agenda foreveryboard meetingandboth agree on the manner in which matterswill be presented to theboard.
Taking account of the principles of goodcorporategovernance, which of the following statements is correct?

A : is entirely appropriate that Tom and Peter have this kind of relationship and both are acting in the best interests of the company

B : n-contentious board meetings show how well Tom and Peter are running the company and shows that the management is cohesive.

C : relationship between Peter and Tom may have a detrimental effect on company decision making as the Boardis not always being informed about matters in an unbiased manner.

D : nce the non-executive chair clearly has a significant role within this company there is little danger that any individual will become excessively dominant.

Answer: C

Page: 1 / 56

Total 276 Questions | Updated On: Aug 01, 2026

Add To Cart